This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: BROKEN_LDEXP - still useful?
- To: Robert Lipe <robertlipe at usa dot net>
- Subject: Re: BROKEN_LDEXP - still useful?
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 00:04:26 -0700
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010430195937.L6612@stanford.edu> <20010501205842.A950@rjlaptop.sco.com> <20010503192817.E26275@stanford.edu> <20010504205924.A1704@rjlaptop.sco.com> <20010507123122.J32266@stanford.edu> <20010508005816.A1099@rjlaptop.sco.com>
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:58:16AM -0500, Robert Lipe wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >
> > Here y'go. I removed i?86-*-sco3.2v4* and i?86-*-sco* which sets up
> > an even older set of configuration parameters.
>
> Looks good to me (for the trunk), Zack. I'm travelling and can't
> test it but if you've verified that we don't have things including
> the files you're vaporizing, I'm cool with it.
Yes, I did check that.
I'd forgotten to update POTFILES.in, but the patch I checked in does.
(the diff is uninteresting)
> > I'm now wondering how many old SVR3-based systems we are still
> > carrying around baggage for when they're thoroughly dead. These are
>
> I'll try to answer for the IA32 targets.
>
> > i?86-*-isc*
> > i?86-*-lynxos*
> > i?86-*-sysv*
>
> ISC was bought by Sun in the early part of the decade and ceased
> to produce a product under that badge. Other than a token Y2K fix
> a few years ago, this has been dead for a long time.
Okay.
> Without knowing what exactly the "sysv*" stuff is trying to match, I'm
> guessing that a catch-all for the esoteric Unixen like Dell, UHC, Esix,
> Consensys and such. I think those are even less likely to be in active
> use than ISC. If, OTOH, it matches something else, then it might be
> less dead than I'm suggesting.
I cannot be certain, but it *appears* that the current config.guess
will never generate a triple matching i?86-*-sysvX* where X <= 4.
sysv4* and sysv5* are caught by different config.gcc logic.
> > i?86-ibm-aix*
>
> AIX for the PS/2. Eeeeek! Bad memories. I'll let Dave have the
> final vote, but I'm pretty sure this one is quite dead, too.
Okay.
You didn't say anything about i?86-*-lynxos*...
--
zw They are calling true what their heart desires; what they would have
be true, and if the iron bones of the earth or the light in the width
of the sky say different, they will not permit these things to be
knowledge within them, nor grant regard to any who do.
-- Graydon Saunders