This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Nov 23, 2000, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm a bit unsure about whether it's more appropriate for `sibcalli' > and `sibcalli_pcrel' and `sibcall_pcrel' to have type `jump_ind' or > `call', but the way it is now (the latter is `call', the others are > `jump_ind') appears to be working fine (i.e., no regressions in the > testsuite). > Ok to install? Nope. There were actually 2 failures I had failed to notice before. We must not assign a call-saved register to hold the address of the function to be sibcalled, because the epilogue will overwrite it. I'll probably have to create a new constraint to match only call-clobbered registers. Meanwhile `z' (r0) will do. Ok to install with this modification, assuming a new round of testing fixes the problems without introducing new ones? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |