This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcc c++ support bits moved
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: libgcc c++ support bits moved
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:58:09 GMT
- Cc: Todd Vierling <tv at wasabisystems dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0010092107080.5694-100000@server.int.duh.org><200011102130.VAA07964@cse.cygnus.com><20001110161706.A11966@redhat.com>
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 09:30:16PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> However, I still think it's important to keep the freestanding support
>> library separate from the hosted library, since the latter has a bunch
>> of startup code that should not be imposed on folks that don't use the
>> functionality.
> This has been done. If you configure for v3, you'll get a
> libsupc++.a.
Ah. Well, never mind then. :)
> This additional support library is incorporated into libstdc++.{a,so},
> so under normal hosted conditions you don't need to think about the
> support library. But it is there nontheless.
I would prefer that it be separate from libstdc++.so, for the same
reason as libgcc.so. Including it in the .a should be fine, if that's
simpler.
> Given that v2 is going away soon, I didn't think it worth the effort
> to do the proper makefile hackery in that subdirectory.
Agreed.
Jason