This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2016
| 17:16 | Help with linker options | Nikolaus Dunn |
| 11:28 | Re: Clarification on gcc tail call optimization | Andrew Haley |
| 10:29 | Clarification on gcc tail call optimization | raghesh |
| 09:25 | Re: How do I get rid of a memory hole(in cortexm0plus)? | Mason |
October 30, 2016
| 08:46 | Re: large amount of sys time when using posix threads | Andrew Haley |
| 08:31 | How do I get rid of a memory hole(in cortexm0plus)? | Johann Klammer |
| 06:46 | large amount of sys time when using posix threads | Debajyoti Chatterjee |
| 03:46 | Re: string constants in -fpie mode? | Segher Boessenkool |
October 29, 2016
| 22:02 | string constants in -fpie mode? | Tycho Andersen |
| 12:51 | Re: What makes a difference in the resulting compiler's speed when building gcc? | Sven C. Dack |
| 10:24 | Linker Section rodata.R* and rodata.F* | Thorsten Czujack |
October 28, 2016
| 18:48 | Re: -Wshadow option vs. init lists | Paul Smith |
| 18:24 | Re: -Wshadow option vs. init lists | Jonathan Wakely |
| 15:58 | Re: Throwing std::ios_base::failure on formatted input with gcc 6.2 | Martin Sebor |
| 12:25 | Re: in-accurate costs to estimate function body size? | Richard Biener |
| 12:18 | in-accurate costs to estimate function body size? | Pitchumani Sivanupandi |
| 09:53 | Re: Effect of -fexec-charset with C++11 string literals | Marvin Gülker |
| 05:57 | -Wshadow option vs. init lists | Paul Smith |
October 27, 2016
October 26, 2016
October 25, 2016
| 22:42 | Re: x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Balázs Oroszi |
| 22:36 | Re: x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Jeffrey Walton |
| 22:24 | Re: x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Balázs Oroszi |
| 22:10 | Re: x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Jeffrey Walton |
| 21:58 | Re: x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Balázs Oroszi |
| 20:12 | Re: Clarification for parameters around the assembler | Florian Weimer |
| 20:09 | Re: what's the right way to use custom entry point | Florian Weimer |
October 22, 2016
| 14:22 | Re: Clarification for parameters around the assembler | Markus Elfring |
| 09:34 | Clarification for parameters around the assembler | Markus Elfring |
| 07:42 | what's the right way to use custom entry point | Cong Monkey |
October 21, 2016
| 05:11 | RE: builtin sscanf | fedor_qd |
October 20, 2016
| 21:32 | MD5 of gcc generated .so lib | Nastooh |
| 21:15 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | Florian Weimer |
| 18:27 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | Jeff Law |
| 18:05 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | john smith |
| 18:04 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | john smith |
| 18:02 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | john smith |
| 18:01 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | Jonathan Wakely |
| 18:00 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | john smith |
| 17:53 | Re: the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | Jonathan Wakely |
| 17:42 | the same gcc binary emits warnings on one machine but not on another | john smith |
| 11:33 | Re: builtin sscanf | Mason |
October 19, 2016
| 20:05 | Re: builtin sscanf | Jeff Law |
| 18:45 | Re: builtin sscanf | fedor_qd |
| 10:48 | Re: Question --Why "undefined reference" linker error, when trying to use a static class member that is a pointer to another class? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 10:44 | EczigFxyzy | Kate Leung |
| 10:42 | Question --Why "undefined reference" linker error, when trying to use a static class member that is a pointer to another class? | Steve Petrie, P.Eng. |
October 18, 2016
| 16:53 | Re: BLK mode move pattern ? | Jeff Law |
| 16:45 | Re: builtin sscanf | Jeff Law |
October 17, 2016
| 10:51 | x86/64 alignment, optimization, -Wcast-align | Balázs Oroszi |
October 16, 2016
| 16:52 | Re: warn on unused result without attribute warn_unused_result | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 15:25 | Effect of -fexec-charset with C++11 string literals | Marvin Gülker |
October 14, 2016
| 17:37 | Re: Determination of argument passed to operator new | Nikolaus Dunn |
| 17:29 | Re: Determination of argument passed to operator new | Jonathan Wakely |
| 17:26 | Determination of argument passed to operator new | Nikolaus Dunn |
| 15:05 | Re: warn on unused result without attribute warn_unused_result | Martin Sebor |
| 13:17 | Re: How long gcc builds on Linux? | Tim Prince |
| 12:57 | Re: How long gcc builds on Linux? | Paul Smith |
| 07:44 | Re: Loop Optimization | Mason |
| 04:40 | RE: How long gcc builds on Linux? | fedor_qd |
October 13, 2016
| 20:29 | Re: How long gcc builds on Linux? | Paul Smith |
| 20:18 | Re: How long gcc builds on Linux? | Martin Sebor |
| 18:40 | Re: warn on unused result without attribute warn_unused_result | Jeff Law |
| 18:33 | warn on unused result without attribute warn_unused_result | Ben Burns |
| 14:06 | Re: BLK mode move pattern ? | Martien de Jong |
| 11:33 | Re: How long gcc builds on Linux? | Jonathan Wakely |
| 10:24 | How long gcc builds on Linux? | fedor_qd |
| 07:03 | builtin sscanf | fedor_qd |
| 06:11 | Loop Optimization | Debajyoti Chatterjee |
October 12, 2016
| 16:54 | Re: BLK mode move pattern ? | Jeff Law |
| 09:24 | Is __builtin_choose_expr supposed to suppress type errors? | Florian Weimer |
| 09:08 | BLK mode move pattern ? | Martien de Jong |
| 08:04 | Re: A GCC Compile Farm account | Roman Gareev |
| 08:02 | Re: A GCC Compile Farm account | Markus Trippelsdorf |
| 07:32 | A GCC Compile Farm account | Roman Gareev |
October 11, 2016
| 10:16 | Re: __attribute__((constructor(<prio>))) creating inconsistent sections | Dan Ciliske |
| 08:57 | __attribute__((constructor(<prio>))) creating inconsistent sections | Dan Ciliske |
| 08:26 | Re: Can argv be NULL in C? | Mason |
| 08:14 | Re: Can argv be NULL in C? | Yao Qi |
October 09, 2016
| 11:27 | Re: Build on Alpine Linux | Florian Weimer |
October 08, 2016
| 04:57 | Re: Build on Alpine Linux | Nick |
| 04:49 | Build on Alpine Linux | Nick |
October 07, 2016
| 19:43 | Re: -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables versus debugging | waltdnes |
| 19:37 | Re: Relocation avoidance for function pointers | Martin Sebor |
| 19:28 | Re: Relocation avoidance for function pointers | Florian Weimer |
| 18:20 | Re: Relocation avoidance for function pointers | Martin Sebor |
| 17:27 | Re: Can argv be NULL in C? | Martin Sebor |
| 16:57 | Re: -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables versus debugging | Andrew Haley |
| 16:40 | Can argv be NULL in C? | Yao Qi |
| 15:51 | Relocation avoidance for function pointers | Florian Weimer |
| 14:42 | Re: -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables versus debugging | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 09:25 | Re: -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables versus debugging | Mason |
| 09:17 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Mason |
October 06, 2016
| 23:50 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Michael J. Fuhrman |
| 19:28 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Michael J. Fuhrman |
| 19:07 | Getting DWARF sub-program pure virtual attribute | crasypantz |
| 17:26 | -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables versus debugging | waltdnes |
| 08:54 | Obtaining a list of a function's aliases in GCC-4.7+ | Bertram, Alexander |
October 04, 2016
| 16:31 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Johann Klammer |
| 14:14 | Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? | waltdnes |
| 08:50 | Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? | Mason |
| 08:27 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | mfuhrman at enetarch dot net |
October 03, 2016
| 22:40 | Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? | waltdnes |
| 18:16 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Florian Weimer |
| 18:13 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Maciej W. Rozycki |
| 17:39 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Florian Weimer |
| 17:34 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Maciej W. Rozycki |
| 17:24 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Florian Weimer |
| 17:09 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Maciej W. Rozycki |
| 15:23 | Re: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Florian Weimer |
| 14:29 | Re: Sed LLP | Andrew Haley |
| 14:25 | Re: Sed LLP | Mason |
| 13:57 | RE: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Maciej W. Rozycki |
| 13:37 | Sed LLP | Quinlan Macdonald |
| 12:45 | RE: Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Matthew Fortune |
| 09:26 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Mason |
| 09:06 | Re: Is "-march=atom" deprecated? | Mason |
| 08:33 | Re: gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | Andrew Haley |
October 02, 2016
| 23:57 | gcc v5+ generates code that cause segment faults | mfuhrman at enetarch dot net |
October 01, 2016
| 21:03 | Why -mxgot on MIPS and not -fpic/-fPIC? | Florian Weimer |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]