This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:17:56 -0700
- Subject: Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- References: <CAGDaZ_q44kY=wZSu79FJLUf+8ebkhn+SWvzmc-ze=ag65pXdjw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8zpz4rkTXpSsH1yDRXgU=EVZO5bsVmf8ZdcT5oX_1x0sQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAGDaZ_qfJhVK7N3q8zb7ijePR5t_xoL7Cm7RMJ=BG8u36FhzMg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm sampling an experimental gentoo ebuild of gcc 4.8.0 and got an
>>> error saying that there was no "0.17" version of cloog.
>>
>> It always helps to tell us the exact error message. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>> However, I do have 0.18 installed.
>>>
>>> Is 0.18 just too raw to trust or is gcc deliberately avoiding it for a
>>> good reason?
>>
>> GCC 4.8 does accept cloog 0.18. I don't know what is going wrong.
>
> Attached is the failed build log
Thanks. As it says at the end:
configure: error: Unable to find a usable CLooG. See config.log for details.
So we need to see the relevant part of the config.log file.
Ian