This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: acceptable versions of cloog?

From: Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:22:42 -0700
Subject: Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
References: <CAGDaZ_q44kY=wZSu79FJLUf+8ebkhn+SWvzmc-ze=ag65pXdjw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8zpz4rkTXpSsH1yDRXgU=EVZO5bsVmf8ZdcT5oX_1x0sQ at mail dot gmail dot com>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm sampling an experimental gentoo ebuild of gcc 4.8.0 and got an
>> error saying that there was no "0.17" version of cloog.
>
> It always helps to tell us the exact error message.  Thanks.
>
>
>> However, I do have 0.18 installed.
>>
>> Is 0.18 just too raw to trust or is gcc deliberately avoiding it for a
>> good reason?
>
> GCC 4.8 does accept cloog 0.18.  I don't know what is going wrong.
>
> Ian

Attached is the failed build log

Attachment: build.log
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- acceptable versions of cloog?
  - From: Raymond Jennings
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]