This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?

From: Parmenides <mobile dot parmenides at gmail dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Gcc mailing list <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:16:35 +0800
Subject: Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?
References: <CAOXENUhL5=Qg568Sk=pK=TEF0uwbb7xjbwNj7sGfZs2F01fxEw@mail.gmail.com> <mcripr5epvd.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <CAOXENUh-tLHnBWXNK-ov=MD-osVH9H9opinctuBkkHMW3+3Zuw@mail.gmail.com> <mcrr55tbctw.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <CAOXENUjnSeVZ2OvAjPaSVk6m4vgxYnL28h2OGBKT-7fSjoRC0g@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, there is a code error in the C source. The inline assembly is like this:

    asm volatile(
         "nop" : : : "memory"
         );

References:
- Is there any other optimization for memory?
  - From: Parmenides
- Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?
  - From: Parmenides
- Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is there any other optimization for memory?
  - From: Parmenides

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]