This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM GCC rename static functions?

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Pan ruochen <panruochen at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:17:29 -0700
Subject: Re: ARM GCC rename static functions?
References: <BANLkTimZDCwFRRry7whXsr+zgO7rzhsaZg@mail.gmail.com> <4E0853F1.7080103@redhat.com> <BANLkTincop_AvpD2gSEZE3QoyUkhr4sLgQ@mail.gmail.com>

Pan ruochen <panruochen@gmail.com> writes:

> Well, there is not a symbol named 'register_signal_handler' in a.out.
> I think gcc creates a new internal name T.25 to substitute the
> original register_signal_handler for some purpose.
> Is there any option to disable this feature?
> I really think it brings me troubles in translating the T.xx stuff
> back to the original symbol names when I have to read the unassembly
> code.

Besides Andrew's answer, renaming the symbol back to the original would
be very misleading, as the new function does not take the same arguments
as the original.

Ian

References:
- ARM GCC rename static functions?
  - From: Pan ruochen
- Re: ARM GCC rename static functions?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: ARM GCC rename static functions?
  - From: Pan ruochen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]