This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function

From: Jonathan Kinsey <jon_kinsey at hotmail dot com>
To: Tim Prince <tprince at myrealbox dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:37:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
References: <BAY108-DAV4CDFCBB7A9C63D78CD854F8AB0@phx.gbl> <45AE543F.3080509@myrealbox.com> <BAY108-DAV149E682C072E9DCDF4540DF8AA0@phx.gbl> <45AF5A2C.2000608@myrealbox.com> <BAY108-DAV664C619A5B462F1BD0CD5F8AA0@phx.gbl> <45AF676C.9020402@myrealbox.com> <BAY108-DAV15D1F73D992C44575E5397F8AA0@phx.gbl> <45AF8DFA.5080401@myrealbox.com>

Tim Prince wrote:
> This is my original point, even though your gcc function receives a
> mis-aligned stack, with normal options, and correctly built binutils, it
> should pass an aligned stack to its callee.

This isn't the case here, the only stack alignment is done in main().
I'm using binutils 2.16 if that helps.

Jon

References:
- Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Jonathan Kinsey
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Jonathan Kinsey
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Jonathan Kinsey
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Jonathan Kinsey
- Re: Misalignment of local SSE variables in thread function
  - From: Tim Prince

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]