This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HÃÃMÃÃÃÃtxÃtsÃ
- From: "zeratul976 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:29:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HÃÃMÃÃÃÃtxÃtsÃ
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51852-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852
--- Comment #15 from Nathan Ridge <zeratul976 at hotmail dot com> 2012-01-27 06:29:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > One thing to do is to use --param ggc-min-expand=1 --param ggc-min-heapsize=1
> > and try to reduce it from there. And then when you get down use 0's instead of
> > 1. That should help with GC issues.
>
> The error goes away when I add those options! Is that expected?
On the other hand, if I add only --param gcc-min-expand=1, there error is still
there, and it seems to be much more stable now with respect to small changes in
the code. There may be hope for a reduction after all...