This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/51981] Missing uninitialized_move() implementation?


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-01-25 15:00:26 UTC ---
Marc gave you an important practical advice and rationale, but as matter of
principle is more important that the function is *non standard*, really if you
use that you are *outside* the new C++11 Standard, is that clear? And the name
isn't uglified thus even if we wanted we could not add it and remain
conforming. This issue is invalid.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]