This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/51389] GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389

Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-01-24
                 CC|                            |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-24 09:07:20 UTC ---
Confirmed.  We have a loop with a couple thousands of bbs and >20k datarefs,
and we die in a quadratic loops in compute_all_dependences.  Can be easily
fixed with a PARAM limiting the data ref analysis.

While doing this, I noticed that there is no reason for
find_data_references_in_loop to be extern and made it static.  Also predcom and
parloops are not ready for compute_data_dependences_for_loop returning false,
so I fixed this as well.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]