This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode
- From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:02:59 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51918-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[4.7 regression] |g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6
|g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6 |.C FAILs in C++11 mode
|.C FAILs |
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-22 17:02:59 UTC ---
As discussed on the lists, the extra xfail only applies
to targets that define TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION
to ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_delta. In other respects it falls
into the same category as the existing c++11 xfails.
I committed the xfail before seeing this PR. I suppose
we should keep the bug open to track all three xfails.