This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/51860] [4.7 regression] s390 esa mode bootstrap comparison failure since transactional memory branch merge


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-16 07:17:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26336
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26336
patch

I believe the problem is that INSN_ADDRESSES of the CALL_INSN is different from
INSN_ADDRESSES of the NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION that follows it (which is
equal to the next insn).
Will look at this in more detail shortly.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]