This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:31:04 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #25270|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #29 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-15 13:31:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 26331
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26331
merged patch
> > Note that reapplying r181405 with the Richard Sandiford's patch at
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html fixes the failures on
> > powerpc-apple-darwin9 without visible side effect on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
I am attaching the resulting patch for revision 183181. Could it be tested on
the platforms for which revision 181405 caused some failures: i.e., AIX
(comment #12, tested without regression on Darwin), mips-linux-gnu (comment
#18), and SH target when compiling for big endian (comment #19).
> Then let's do that ASAP.
Agreed, but I am not a maintainer nor a reviewer!-)