[Bug target/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

["iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784

--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 10:22:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Doesn't powerpc-darwin have the same problem?  Not sure if it defaults to
> -fpic, perhaps just with explicit -fpic?

powerpc makes provision (in the ABI) to save the pic reg in nested functions -
so it might have a different/or no problem.

> Are you ok with dropping the Regression tag 

I don't think this is a regression - I think it's been there for(ever/long
time).

(or, just xfailing the testcase on
> *-darwin* for now with a reference to this PR)

I guess xfailing is the thing to do for now - maybe give Mike a day or two in
case there's a really easy fix.

 (it's not as simple as just doing that subtraction, as there is no guarantee
that x uses or even saves the PIC reg as things stand) ... 

I am not familiar with how the non-local goto system works, so there's some
reading for me to do before even cooking up a test...