This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:31:55 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10 11:31:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> You don't. We're supposed to prevent frame-related insns
> from appearing in branch delay slots.
Richard,
do you mean this in general, or just for calls?
Either way, we should be able to formulate an assert in scan_trace that checks
this condition. Do you think that would be useful?
Thanks,
- Tom