This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of "**" shown
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:45:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of "**" shown
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50105-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-10 08:45:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back?
No, but I just wrote one:
http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2012-January/004976.html
The next J3 meeting will be #197, February 13-17, 2012, Las Vegas NV USA
The IR should pop up soon at:
http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/197/
> I am leaning toward current 4.7 is OK and 4.6 has the regression.
Sorry, that twists my mind. 4.6.0 *and* 4.7 produce "******". (While g77 and
GCC 4.1 to 4.5 produce "** ".)
Any reason - in terms of the standard - why you "am leaning toward current
4.7"?
I believe that Bob Corbett and Malcolm Cohen are right and "** " is the
correct output - even if more compilers have six asterisks:
"** ": g77, gfortran < 4.6, g95, NAG f95, PGI
"******": gfortran >= 4.6.0, ifort, crayftn, open64, pathf95, Sun/Oracle f95,
IBM xlf