This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/51124] libitm failures
- From: "torvald at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:03:37 +0000
- Subject: [Bug other/51124] libitm failures
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51124-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 15:03:37 UTC ---
So the variadic-args vs. regparm(2) issue is the only blocker here?
There's no decision yet about this one so far, AFAIK. As I said before,
combining the vararg with regparm seemed to be a thought-through decision, so
the question is really whether it makes sense conceptually and is just not
implemented properly in GCC, or whether the combination doesn't make sense at
all and we should drop regparm(2) from _ITM_beginTransaction.