This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/51781] New: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking
- From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:59:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51781] New: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51781
Bug #: 51781
Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ktietz@gcc.gnu.org
Target: *-*-*
The following code shows an issue about missed optimization for ==/!=
comparisons.
extern unsigned char ar[256];
int foo (int x, int y)
{
int i = (int) ar[x];
return (i == (y & 0xff));
}
Compiled with 4.7 using -O2 we get the following optimized tree:
;; Function foo (foo, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1600, cgraph_uid=0)
foo (int x, int y)
{
int i;
_Bool D.2716;
int D.2715;
int D.2714;
unsigned char D.2713;
<bb 2>:
D.2713_2 = ar[x_1(D)];
i_3 = (int) D.2713_2;
D.2715_5 = y_4(D) & 255;
D.2716_6 = D.2715_5 == i_3;
D.2714_7 = (int) D.2716_6;
return D.2714_7;
}
But to be expected would be:
;; Function foo (foo, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1709, cgraph_uid=0)
foo (int x, int y)
{
unsigned char D.1719;
_Bool D.1716;
int D.1714;
unsigned char D.1713;
<bb 2>:
D.1713_2 = ar[x_1(D)];
D.1719_9 = (unsigned char) y_4(D);
D.1716_6 = D.1713_2 == D.1719_9;
D.1714_7 = (int) D.1716_6;
return D.1714_7;
}