This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:58:30 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51725-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-02 14:58:30 UTC ---
While the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725#c5 change might not
be a complete solution, I think it is right and desirable, because
new_elt_loc_list doesn't add the MEM location to mem_elt's locs, but to its
canonical_cselib_val's locs (if different from mem_elt of course), and at that
point we'd be adding e.g. into addr_list as well as first_containing_mem chain
something that didn't get any MEM locs.