This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/47538] [4.6 Regression] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:13:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/47538] [4.6 Regression] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-31 10:13:07 UTC ---
> Why do we need something so ill-designed as sizetype? Just for Ada?
Yes, they are useful for Ada, but the _original_ design; the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
mistake is orthogonal to it and shouldn't be an excuse to eliminate them.