This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/46567] [trans-mem] ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567

Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amacleod at redhat dot com

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> 2011-01-28 19:41:28 UTC ---
discussion starting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01479.html
for the third approach which I implemented. checked in as revision 169369 on
Jan 28.

This implements the need to track whether a call in in a transaction or not.

The follow on bugs are not related to that problem specifically, but then I
wonder if the original problem was *really* tracking the bit :-).  Regardless,
not requiring the bit is a good thing, and will help prevent future problems.

looking at the other testcase now.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]