This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
- From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:35:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-27 16:35:13 UTC ---
I remember the discussion when we first implemented this and we wanted the + on
Inf to be consistent with -Inf.
Oh well, if folks really feel strongly about this, I can change it all. Hmm, I
think I will add the optional NaN type field so now the smallest I can fit will
be quite a bit wider then 3. (Just kidding ;) )