This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:08:46 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-27 13:08:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Regarding the other cases:
> Similarly for the '+' sign on Inf. Until now we have chosen to emit the
> optional characters.
Comparison with other compilers for the example of comment 3.
a) Crayftn 7.2.4
Infinity
Inf
0.00
.00
0.00
.00
b) ifort 11.1, PathScale 3.2.99, Open64 4.2.2.1,
Infinity
Inf
0.00
.00
0.00
.00
c) Sun Fortran 95 8.3, pgf90 10.5-0
Inf
Inf
0.00
.00
0.00
.00
d) g95 4.03 (0.93)
+Inf
Inf
.00
.00
.00
.00
e) xlf95/AIX V12.1
INF
INF
0.00
.00
0.00
.00
f) NAG 5.1
<<< Yes, that's an zero-length string
Inf
.00
.00
.00
.00
g) g77: Does not like w = 0 and prints "inf" (small "i"), and ".00" for the
other lines.