This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/37773] -Wfatal-errors aborts too early


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773

Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 09:57:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Works as desigened.  Really ;)

So what is the point of -fmax-errors=N ? 

Shouldn't the documentation of Wfatal-errors say: "This option is not for users
but for compiler developers only"?

BTW, clang also supports -Wfatal-errors=option.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]