This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334

--- Comment #32 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-01-23 13:14:56 UTC ---
> The relevant pr for comment #30 is pr45810 comment #9. The threshold for
> fatigue.f90 was322 before revision 169136 and is now 1520 (~x5).
Interesting. Do you know what function we fail to inline?
Can you attach ipa-inline dump from both settings?
I know that also c-ray wants to increase inline limits.  I can increase them a
bit,
but not by factor of 5, since that would cause code size explosion at -O3.
(I did some tests on this two weeks ago)

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]