This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:50:27 +0000
Subject: [Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
References: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878

--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:50:25 UTC ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
> 
> --- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:40:44 UTC ---
> Of course, one could argue that perhaps the compare should *not* have been
> removed?  I don't know how clever the new redundant compare removal code is.
That's part of why I want a dump -- I seem to recall rules about
removing comparisons on cc0 machines and reading the dumps may help me
recall what those rules are.

jeff

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNOim8AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7G5YIAIh7Nfv7ALDaKC3QwbKoqaXw
7zXr66Z1ephIXWQ/4eav6y7EXVapTl546ygOCjZg3IHEy2g0BJxwUzJk2vbIcbM9
1WnWQizMQdjGUcjSNtJsntoB5Yx7+xo4Y7ENeUct+yeQNPx19gkQ0H11mUuBY5ZV
Mqli07f0nzZ5dwWvdwoSngbYKMtgfYL6cIBsKVDvRPdHSGWH/27bcG0ExjCwTZsm
5AcVxRLrmD/FcqDXTW8sZEVyms0sEdmBb2v9eL6TlEqmzvVOZlSj2IjjNePYD4KY
O9VDU3ZgoHdrr8fzaW3ZsKyCrAwLVZZ1mYHeJt1nqnif64w4X++XRxZtlOGT1uM=
=S5Gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]