This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/47274] [4.6 regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:306


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274

--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-01-17 16:05:56 UTC ---
> Note that the assert probably should do &&, not ||.  Or it doesn't
> make sense at all.  Asserting that the prevailing_node is analyzed
> should be enough.
No, the assert basically test that when node is analyzed prevailing_node must
be analyzed, too.  So the test tests the implication, not conjunction.

It is possible that we merge two unanalyzed nodes (such as aliases).

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]