This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/47274] [4.6 regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:306
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:50:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/47274] [4.6 regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto-symtab.c:306
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47274-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-17 13:49:47 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this with the testcase from comment #3 on x86_64-linux
with either gold or GNU ld from stock binutils 2.21 nor without using
the linker plugin.
The only call to lto_varpool_replace_node sees
Breakpoint 5, lto_varpool_replace_node (vnode=0x7ffff5d041a0,
prevailing_node=0x7ffff5d040d0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/lto-symtab.c:304
304 if (vnode->needed)
(gdb) n
306 gcc_assert (!vnode->analyzed || prevailing_node->analyzed);
(gdb) p vnode->analyzed
$1 = 0
(gdb) p prevailing_node->analyzed
$2 = 1
Note that the assert probably should do &&, not ||. Or it doesn't
make sense at all. Asserting that the prevailing_node is analyzed
should be enough.
Honza?
People, you have to show us what goes wrong for you.