This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/47136] [OOP] possible name resolution problems between MODULE and INTERFACE?
- From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:46:46 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/47136] [OOP] possible name resolution problems between MODULE and INTERFACE?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47136-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47136
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02 14:46:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Some related non-OOP examples:
> [...]
> > Are these examples actually valid or invalid? Can someone give the relevant
> > quotes from the standard?
>
> Lahey's online source checker rejects both examples with similar messages.
So do openf95 and pathf95.
> It
> doesn't know OOP to test, but one could think that my initial example is
> invalid after all?!
I agree that it may be invalid, but one should check the exact wording in the
standard.