This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold
- From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jan 2008 05:11:38 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold
- References: <bug-20623-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #38 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 05:11 -------
Update: mainline appears to pass fold checking albeit with a few extra timeouts
due to length compilation times. However the last fix for fold checking was
never backported to the branches. On 4.1/4.2 I still get these extra fold
checking errors due to label addresses:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20021108-1.c
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/920501-7.c
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-1.c
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c
FAIL: gcc.dg/20021029-1.c
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr16973.c
Here are the latest results for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu:
4.1 (extra errors): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01221.html
4.2 (extra errors): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01222.html
trunk (x86_64 ok): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01253.html
I don't have access to solaris any more to see if there are still gomp fold
checking failures as from comment #37.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|4.0.4 4.1.2 |4.0.4 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.2.2
| |4.2.3
Known to work| |4.3.0
Last reconfirmed|2007-06-30 02:16:08 |2008-01-26 05:11:37
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623