This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/25957] -fstack-protector code on i386/x86-64 can be improved.



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-25 13:21 -------
Nope and Nope.
The alignment is because well -falign-jumps is default.

__stack_chk_fail is a noreturn function so we don't sib call it because it
would be too hard for debugging.
Second jumping directly via an indirect branch is wrong as jumps only have a
certain range.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25957


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]