This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/25957] -fstack-protector code on i386/x86-64 can be improved.
- From: "ak at muc dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jan 2006 14:15:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/25957] -fstack-protector code on i386/x86-64 can be improved.
- References: <bug-25957-7834@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from ak at muc dot de 2006-01-25 14:15 -------
You're wrong. On i386 and x86-64 call and conditional jumps have the same
range.
That you're using the normal align-jumps for such uncommon code is a bug in my
opinion and that is why I opened this request. It is a waste of space
for code that is known to be uncommon at compile time like this.
The debugging argument seems bogus in this case too. You'll see the
original function in the backtrace, but that is ok here.
--
ak at muc dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25957