This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/23254] New: gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug
- From: "christopherbuell at mindspring dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Aug 2005 20:31:54 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/23254] New: gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax bug
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
While testing some FORTRAN 90 code under Fedora Core 4,
I found problem initializing COMPLEX PARAMETERs with other
parameters that have + or - in front of the variable name.
The following .f90 test code will illustrate the problem.
All lines should compile fine.
The lines that fail are commented with "fail"
module consts_test
real(8), parameter :: konst1 = 1.0d0
complex, parameter :: const1 = (1.0d0,1.0d0) ! good
complex, parameter :: const2 = (1.0d0,-1.0d0) ! good
complex, parameter :: const3 = (-1.0d0,-1.0d0) ! good
complex, parameter :: const4 = (-1.0d0,1.0d0) ! good
complex, parameter :: const5 = (+1.0d0,+1.0d0) ! good
complex, parameter :: const6 = (konst1,konst1) ! good
complex, parameter :: const7 = (konst1,-konst1) ! fail
complex, parameter :: const8 = (-konst1,-konst1) ! fail
complex, parameter :: const9 = (-konst1,konst1) ! fail
complex, parameter :: const10 = (+konst1,+konst1) ! fail
end module consts_test
!! GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8))
!! Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
!! GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
!! You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran
!! under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
!! For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING
--
Summary: gfortran .f90 complex parameter initialization syntax
bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christopherbuell at mindspring dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23254