[Bug c/22476] -Wmissing-format-attribute should pick out function pointer candidates also

["cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-19 12:10 -------
Subject: Bug 22476

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	ghazi@gcc.gnu.org	2005-07-19 12:09:49

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog c-common.c c-format.c c-opts.c 
	                 c-typeck.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
	gcc/doc        : invoke.texi 
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format: miss-1.c miss-2.c 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format: miss-3.c miss-4.c miss-5.c miss-6.c 
Removed files:
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format: opt-6.c 

Log message:
	PR c/22476
	* c-common.c (check_function_arguments): Call
	'check_function_format' if either -Wformat or
	-Wmissing-format-attribute are specified.
	* c-format.c (check_function_format): Check -Wformat before
	calling 'check_format_info'.
	* c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Don't warn for
	-Wmissing-format-attribute without -Wformat.
	* c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Detect additional cases for
	-Wmissing-format-attribute.
	* doc/invoke.texi (-Wmissing-format-attribute): Document new
	behavior.
	
	testsuite:
	* gcc.dg/format/miss-1.c, gcc.dg/format/miss-2.c: Don't
	specify -Wformat for these tests.
	* gcc.dg/format/miss-3.c, gcc.dg/format/miss-4.c,
	gcc.dg/format/miss-5.c, gcc.dg/format/miss-6.c: New.
	* gcc.dg/format/opt-6.c: Delete.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9474&r2=2.9475
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.644&r2=1.645
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-format.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.82&r2=1.83
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-opts.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.147&r2=1.148
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-typeck.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.465&r2=1.466
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5782&r2=1.5783
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.648&r2=1.649
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-4.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-5.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-6.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/miss-2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/opt-6.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22476