This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Dec 2004 11:28:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- References: <20040902085559.17278.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23 11:28 -------
Karel, your latest comparison is almost a month old (it was
here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg01157.html), and
we've fixed a few compile time bottlenecks since then. Can
you spare some cycles and send an updated comparison? It's
probably still ir.cc where we have regressions, but perhaps
not as bad as before *fingers crossed* ;-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278