This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt
- From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 4 Oct 2004 17:16:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt
- References: <20041003220518.17817.dberlin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu dot org 2004-10-04 17:16 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then
bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt
> Also it is noteworthy that none of the behavior you are seeing will
> occur with the Paolo's top level bootstrap which I was under the
> impression was supposed to become the default RSN.
No, it will be in the 4.1 timeframe. There are still problems with
combined trees.
Also, note that for toplevel bootstrap you'd want the
STAGEMOVE/STAGECOPY patch you worked on, because it is not as simple as
keeping stamp files around: in that case you have to really copy the
STAGECOPY stuff while configuring successive stages (while STAGEMOVE can
die).
Paolo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17817