This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/15869] [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1 -O0)
- From: "rsandifo at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jun 2004 07:05:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/15869] [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1 -O0)
- References: <20040608081002.15869.niva@niisi.msk.ru>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2004-06-23 07:05 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with
-mips1 -O0)
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-23 06:55 -------
> I think this one needs a bit more testing; apply it after 3.4.1 is out.
Sorry to be pushy, but from whom? I don't think anyone other than me &
David Billinghurst are testing CVS sources at the moment.
If you're thinking about Maciej's offer to test on r3000 h/w: well,
that's going to be useful to see if there are more cases we're missing.
But it's easy to verify (by looking at assembler sources) that the
instance reported in the PR has been fixed. And knowing the code
(and having written it myself ;) I don't think it can introduce
_more_ problems of the same kind.
Could I ask you to reconsider? (Don't worry, if you say no, I won't
ask again.)
Richard
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869