This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/15869] [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1 -O0)
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jun 2004 15:55:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/15869] [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1 -O0)
- References: <20040608081002.15869.niva@niisi.msk.ru>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-06-23 15:54 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1
-O0)
rsandifo at redhat dot com wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2004-06-23 07:05 -------
>Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with
> -mips1 -O0)
>
>"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>
>>------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-23 06:55 -------
>>I think this one needs a bit more testing; apply it after 3.4.1 is out.
>>
>>
>
>Sorry to be pushy, but from whom? I don't think anyone other than me &
>David Billinghurst are testing CVS sources at the moment.
>
>
From whomever is using the MIPS toolchains, in general. :-)
Since this is on the mainline, people will be banging away on it, and if
there are problems, they'll likely find them.
These things are judgement calls -- it's always hard to justify them
precisely one way or the other. My instincts with this patch are a
little different from yours; I feel like it might cause problems, not
because it's wrong per se, but because it might trigger some other
weirdness. If it had gone in a month ago, I'd feel different.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869