This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/15869] [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1 -O0)


------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2004-06-23 15:54 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with -mips1
 -O0)

rsandifo at redhat dot com wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com  2004-06-23 07:05 -------
>Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] No NOP after LW (with
> -mips1 -O0)
>
>"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>  
>
>>------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-23 06:55 -------
>>I think this one needs a bit more testing; apply it after 3.4.1 is out.
>>    
>>
>
>Sorry to be pushy, but from whom?  I don't think anyone other than me &
>David Billinghurst are testing CVS sources at the moment.
>  
>
 From whomever is using the MIPS toolchains, in general. :-)

Since this is on the mainline, people will be banging away on it, and if 
there are problems, they'll likely find them.

These things are judgement calls -- it's always hard to justify them 
precisely one way or the other.  My instincts with this patch are a 
little different from yours; I feel like it might cause problems, not 
because it's wrong per se, but because it might trigger some other 
weirdness.  If it had gone in a month ago, I'd feel different.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]