This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- From: "numerical dot simulation at web dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 14:38:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- References: <20030710141450.11489.numerical.simulation@web.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11489
------- Additional Comments From numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2003-07-11 14:38 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> Markus, there's not much I should say more, but the requirements for a check-in
> are quite clear: run the testsuite and do not observe a regression.
Did I understand you correctly that if the developer finds a regression
he is not allowed to check it in?
Then I am satisfied.
I expected this bug to appear with the testsuite, but obviously I am wrong.
Sorry. And many thanks for rectifying my view on gcc.
Markus