This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- From: "neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jul 2003 20:23:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- References: <20030710141450.11489.numerical.simulation@web.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11489
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2003-07-11 11:54:38 |2003-07-12 20:23:48
date| |
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-12 20:23 -------
I get a different ICE on this code:
test.cxx:34: internal compiler error: in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1230
That's the second assert:
my_friendly_assert (IS_AGGR_TYPE_CODE (TREE_CODE (xbasetype)), 20030624);
Hope this helps. :-)
My tree isn't perfectly up-to-date (it's about 24 hours old) if that matters.