This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- From: "numerical dot simulation at web dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 14:31:54 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- References: <20030710141450.11489.numerical.simulation@web.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11489
------- Additional Comments From numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2003-07-11 14:31 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com wrote:
> This is getting somewhat OT for a bug report. If you have comments about gcc's development
> process, please send them to the list. If you have further questions about the testsuite, I suggest
> checking http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing. To see what parts of g++ are tested by the
> testsuite check gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg. If you find important things are overlooked, by all
> means send in testcases! Thanks.
Is it possible to include parts of boost into the testsuite?
IMHO it is a good idea to include e.g. boost::mpl.
Or do we have a license problem with that one?
Markus