This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- From: "neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Jul 2003 02:19:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- References: <20030630221211.11386.ishikawa@yk.rim.or.jp>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09 02:19 -------
> Probably I should be able to find a difference between
> temacs (by GCC 3.2.3) objdump segment listing and
> temacs (by GCC 3.3) objdump segment listing.
>
> bootstrap-emacs (by GCC 3.2.3), and
> bootstrap-emacs (by GCC 3.3).
See if you can find a difference in the section order, segment order, symbol table, or some such, which might trigger lurking unexec bugs.
Differences in the actual machine code or the length thereof are not going to be meaningful due to the number of changes in code generation. :-P
Looking at unexelf.c, I really want this to be a bug in it, because it's an evil file. :-)