This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- From: "simon dot marshall at misys dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Jul 2003 08:17:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- References: <20030630221211.11386.ishikawa@yk.rim.or.jp>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386
------- Additional Comments From simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2003-07-09 08:17 -------
> Just to clarify: temacs doesn't crash, right?
> Which means the bug is definitely related to the unexec/dump code?
Correct, temacs does not crash.
BTW, on emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dhruva Krishnamurthy [seagull@fastmail.fm] said:
> I had sent an email to the list:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> I had tried building GNU Emacs with GCC 3.3 and had encountered a
> problem which I have raised as a bug in GCC bugzilla(#9816).
> I tried again using a newer port of GCC 3.3 and GCC 3.4 (not an official
> port though) from:
> http://www.thisiscool.com/gcc33_mingw.htm
>
> I am unable to build or even progress to get an emacs.exe (executable).
> With the earlier port of GCC 3.3, I could build a bare emacs executable
> which failed in compiling elisp files.
> If someone has a link to a GCC 3.3 port on W2K (Win32/MinGW), please let
> me know. I will try to do some extensive testing. Unfortunately, I do not
> have the older GCC 3.3 port with me now!
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> As the problem is happening on Windows 2000 (W2K) platform, I feel it is
> not releted to
> unexec and specific to ELF. On W2K, I am not sure it uses 'ld' for
> linking. So, modifications to 'ld' may not be the cause.