This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2003 18:00:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted
- References: <20030628090748.11357.d.frey@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11357
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nathan at codesourcery dot
| |com, giovannibajo at libero
| |dot it
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-06-28 18:00 -------
Confirmed up to mainline, icc compiles this fine.
I think the claim should be valid, though I must admit that I'm at a loss as
to which conversion the compiler should choose. The existence of the
specialization is irrelevant in this context, so the compiler could choose
a conversion to float or double, for example.
I'll leave this to other language lawyers.
W.