This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/9697] [3.4 regression] wrong assembly emitted for m68000 __umulsidi3
- From: "neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2003 06:33:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/9697] [3.4 regression] wrong assembly emitted for m68000 __umulsidi3
- References: <20030213193600.9697.mark_lee_hamilton@worldnet.att.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9697
------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2003-06-28 06:33 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] wrong assembly emitted for m68000 __umulsidi3
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com wrote:-
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9697
>
>
> dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-06-28 00:53 -------
> Neil,
>
> it looks like your conversion of m68k to TARGET_CPU_CPP_PREDEFINES went pretty smoothly
> except on m68k-elf. It seems that mc68020 is no being unconditionally defined, and this is
> breaking multilibs for m68k-elf. Would you mind having a look into this? Thanks,
>
> Dara
It appears that the original bug report is from last Feb and about 3.2, so
it can't have anything to do with my later patches in 3.4.
Neil.