This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/11325] [3.4 regression] nested class debug info incorrect
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jun 2003 18:06:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/11325] [3.4 regression] nested class debug info incorrect
- References: <20030626030149.11325.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11325
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-06-26 18:06 -------
Confirmed. A regression on mainline w.r.t. 3.3.
Benjamin, just for the future:
a) If you confirm a bug, please leave a note in the audit trail who did
it and what were the findings.
b) please don't confirm your own bug reports. I'm very much in favor of
peer review, as it doesn't help anyone to have PRs that seem to be
analyzed but might or might not be due to a local installation problem.
I'm not claiming this is the case here (in fact, I just confirmed your
bug :-), but I think it's better to have everything confirmed by
someone else on a different system.
Thanks
W.