This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/11318] [3.4 regresssion] Spurious bootstrap comparison failures on sparc-sun-solaris
- From: "zack at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jun 2003 16:04:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/11318] [3.4 regresssion] Spurious bootstrap comparison failures on sparc-sun-solaris
- References: <20030625112358.11318.ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11318
------- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2003-06-26 16:04 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regresssion] Spurious bootstrap
comparison failures on sparc-sun-solaris
"ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Unless I'm missing something gcc/config/elfos.h doesn't have a definition
> for the TARGET_ASM_FILE_START_FILE_DIRECTIVE macro. The macro is then defined
> to 0 in target-def.h. Does this patch look better?
It's right here:
| #undef SET_ASM_OP
| #define SET_ASM_OP "\t.set\t"
|
| /* Most svr4 assemblers want a .file directive at the beginning of
| their input file. */
| #define ASM_FILE_START_FILE_DIRECTIVE true
zw