This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new gcc bug

From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
To: Vincent Lefevre <Vincent dot Lefevre at loria dot fr>
Cc: Paul Zimmermann <Paul dot Zimmermann at loria dot fr>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, tege at swox dot com
Date: 23 Jun 2003 22:31:02 +0200
Subject: Re: new gcc bug
References: <200306231408.QAA07441@leibniz.loria.fr><87of0oai8c.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de><20030623161816.GI1211@greux.loria.fr>

Vincent Lefevre <Vincent.Lefevre@loria.fr> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 18:09:23 +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > I cannot reproduce this on ia64-linux with gcc 3.2.3 (or any other
> > release). Note that the correct result is 261941557207, not 60, since
> > long has 64 bit on ia64.
> 
> Not under HP-UX.

Ah, I see. I can reproduce it on HP-UX with the same gcc version, I
don't have any current compiler to test, though.

The bogus result is the low 32 bit of the 64 bit division. Probably
the -1 is sign extended although it shouldn't be (I don't really know
ia64's calling conventions)

-- 
	Falk

References:
- new gcc bug
  - From: Paul Zimmermann
- Re: new gcc bug
  - From: Falk Hueffner
- Re: new gcc bug
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]